Comparing and contrasting Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Comparing and contrasting - Essay Example provision with respect to the control of finances, power of the electorate in respect of amendment of the constitution as well as the role of the prime minister and president in both Australia and USA. Finally, the paper presents the person who established the Constitution for the respective countries and discuss the importance of such an individuals or entity. The powers of the state in both countries are limited by the legislature and judiciary. The High Court of Australia and the legislature check on the powers of the state. The Australian Constitution Section 61 The first sight examination of Australia and USA reveals similar systems of government. The two nations have federated nations. The power to govern is therefore shared between national and state governments. Australian Constitution explicates the legislative, the executive, and the judicial arms of the Australian governance. However, Australia has a limited separation of powers. The members of Australian Executive are drawn from the legislature or parliament. On the other hand, the members of the Judiciary such as the High Court Judges are Governor General Appointees while being advised by the Executive (Saunders, 2008). On the other hand, the Constitution of United States illustrates the separate legislative, executive and judicial arms of the governance. Unlike, Australia the US Constitution prohibits the members of Congress including the House of Representatives and the Senate from being appointed to executives offices. Moreover, the United States’ cabinet members can never be members of legislature, unlike Australia and hence the US President and Secretaries are prohibited from being members of the Congress. The parliamentary sovereignty in both countries arises from their role of law making process as all the bills must be passed and approved by the parliament. However, in the United States the Supreme Courts can trim the laws made based on their wisdom, constitutionality, and workability.